Thursday, April 15, 2010

okay so there was this question on my application for holy cross fellows and then i realized that i probably answeredd it all wrong, but this is what i wrote, and i felt like i had to put it somewhere. here it is:

I believe that God gives us both special revelation (the Bible) and general revelation (things we can learn from nature, history, observation, experience, and science). As they say, all truth is God’s truth. Anything we may see as Truth should be tested by looking at both special and general revelation. We should accept the Bible as authority and God’s word, but not by any one person’s interpretation. I feel that interpretation can be flawed as we are sinful. Biblical interpretation should be done prayerfully and tested by other believers and by what we see as given in general revelation. If what we see in nature is different from our interpretation of the Bible...maybe there was a misinterpretation and we should re-evaluate what the Scriptures are saying.

2 comments:

Rachael said...

Oh, hello David Myers.
haha, just kidding.

Anyway, I concur.

adam said...

i totally agree with you.

usually, when i get asked this question, i reply something like:

"say the book in front of us, right now, has been confirmed by Jesus himself who is at the moment fixing a sandwich in the kitchen to be 100 percent accurate, without flaw, and unequivocally the word of God.

"if you attempt to read that book without the Spirit animating it, you might as well read the back of a cereal box."

sure it's hyperbolic, but you get the point.